In a move described by critics as largely symbolic, members of the House of Representatives have resolved to slash their salaries by 50 percent due to the pervasive economic hardship across Nigeria. The resolution was passed during a plenary session on Thursday, following the adoption of a motion of urgent public importance.
The motion, titled "An Appeal to the Proponents of Proposed Nationwide Protest to Maintain Peace, Eschew Violence, and Open the Windows for Meaningful Engagements with Government at All Levels in Order to Address their Issues," was sponsored by Ibrahim Isiaka from Ogun State.
Deputy Speaker Ben Kalu proposed the amendment, stating that reducing their salaries is a worthy sacrifice the legislators should make for the next six months. "It’s a step towards showing solidarity with the suffering masses," Kalu said, noting that lawmakers currently earn N500,000 monthly.
However, Speaker of the House Tajudeen Abbas corrected him, clarifying that they actually receive N600,000 in monthly salaries.
While the gesture might appear commendable on the surface, many Nigerians view it as a dishonest move that fails to address the real issue. Critics argue that the reduction is only temporary and does not impact the significant allowances that legislators receive, which are often seen as the real financial drain.
"This is just a six-month stunt. It’s not their salaries that sustain them but the hefty allowances they pocket," said a political analyst. "If they were serious about making a meaningful sacrifice, they would cut their allowances, which are the real drainpipes on the nation's resources."
Public sentiment reflects frustration and skepticism about the sincerity of this resolution. Many see it as an attempt to pacify the growing discontent and avoid the proposed nationwide protests rather than a genuine effort to alleviate economic hardship.
As the nation grapples with economic challenges, the demand for transparency and significant reform in government spending continues to rise. Glide News will keep you updated on further developments and reactions to this controversial resolution.
0 Comments